jennickels: (sg1: jack_smirk)
jennickels ([personal profile] jennickels) wrote2014-05-16 10:37 am

New SG-1 topic to discuss

Yes, I'm on a roll with random SG-1 back story questions/topics.

So, over the years I've made a spreadsheet chart of all the characters' ages and whatnot so I can keep track of things. I even add in original characters (if their ages are important) and notes about different aspects of the plot. It's big mess but it works. At one point I was working on a story about Jack when he was teen and that got me thinking about his early military career.

What's the consensus on that? Or is there one?

Based on numerous fan sites one of his ribbons is for service in Vietnam. Being born in 1952 (as the sites say) that would have put him way on the tail end of the war at 18-19 years old so he couldn't have gone to the Academy. In fact, Jack would have had to enlist.

Based on the birthdate of October 20, 1952, Jack would have been eligible for the draft in 1971 and his draft number would have been 331 which was never called. America began pulling out of Vietnam in March of 1973. Yes, I did the research on this.
(also in this research I found out my dad, who enlisted in the Marines when he was 18 never would have been drafted either, his number was never called)

In my head, this is canon. So what happened to him after that? Since you need a degree to become an officer I always assumed he went to college while still on active duty (I'm not sure if that was a thing in the 70s but it is now). Then moved through the ranks, eventually getting a graduate degree, because we all know Jack is a lot smarter than he lets on.

Does all that make sense?

Opposing theories?

[identity profile] jennickels.livejournal.com 2014-05-16 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Ooh, all good info to consider when deciding back story (which obviously can change from story to story).

I like your head canon. And the reasoning for him becoming an officer (rather give commands than take them) sounds exactly like Jack, lol.

My dad ended up enlisting because he didn't want to chance getting drafted and not get into the Marines which is what he wanted.

The thing about his age... I always thought of the thing with Kynthia as him just trying to make a point and he didn't really mean he was 40. The idea was so foreign to her it wouldn't have mattered if he said 40 or 45, he just picked an easy round number. At least that's how I justify it.

Okay, because I should be researching and writing a sociology paper I'm instead researching military advancement, lol.

According to about.com all generals have to retire by 62. Or after 5 years of advancing to whatever rank. Or after 30-35 years of service (for O-7 or O-8, it doesn't discuss ranks above that). I find this all interesting to fit into future fics.

Assuming the 1952 birth year for Jack and him enlisting at 18 (1970-71) that would mean in 2010 (which would be the 2nd season of SGU) he would have been 57-58 years old and have served for approximately 40 years (yikes!).

At this point he's a Lt. General. So assuming he has to retire after 5 years of making rank or by the standard 62... he's pretty much done with his career. An interesting little tidbit. According to the site there are only 38 officers at O-9 in the Air Force. Jack would have been part of a very elite group.

Yes, I've thought about this stuff way too much.
As for Sam... she makes full colonel when she takes over Atlantis, right? Which is around 2007.

Which means by 2010 she could be up for promotion by the minimum in-grade requirements (3 years... this is all from the about.com page). In one of my future fics Jack makes it very clear that Sam is on the short list to take over the SGC when Landry retires (because you can only move up to general if someone retires... or dies).

Okay, I better go back to my actual homework, lol.

Oh, yeah, one site I looked at (don't remember which one at the moment) said that a Master's degree isn't a requirement to move up to any rank but it's almost impossible to make Major without one because it's so competitive.